Based on the PDF document entitled ‘part_results_discussion’ and the attached Wo

Based on the PDF document entitled ‘part_results_discussion’ and the attached Word document ‘’ document to rework short resultsdiscussion’’, can you improve the comments or add new ones were indicated in the Word document
subsection{PMV} (see pdf PhD part_results_discussion page 22)
Rewrite this section in a clearer and more precise manner, considering and adding appropriate additional comments for figures 1.15 and 1.16 see pdf PhD part_results_discussion page 23-24
subsection{DR} (see pdf part_results_discussion page 22)
Rewrite this section in a clearer and more precise manner, considering and adding appropriate additional comments for figures 1.20 1.21 (see pdf PhD part_results_discussion pages 30-31)
section{Equivalent temperature} (see pdf part_results_discussion page 35)
Rewrite this section in a clearer and more precise manner, considering and adding appropriate additional comments for figures 1.27, 1.28, 1.29 and 1.30 (see pdf PhD pages 38-40)
section{Convective heat transfer coefficient distribution on VTM’surface} (see pdf part_results_discussion page 38)
Rewrite this section in a clearer and more precise manner, considering and adding appropriate additional comments for figure 1.31 (see pdf PhD page 42). And explain the difference in table 1.7 (see pdf PhD page 41) between experimental hc, where only convection and radiation are taken into account, and hc in CFD and coupled simulations, where only convection is taken into account (see pdf called article thermal manikin)
Please do not change the structure of the document, as the text is written in LaTeX to be compiled later.