exploring the moral obligation to follow the law and analyzing different perspectives on when this obligation exists.

Question: When, if ever, do you have a moral obligation to do what the law demands because the law demands it?
Compose a 2,000-word essay that delves deeply into the specified literature, with a particular focus on “Simmons – Chapter 3” and “Shelby – Justice, Deviance and the Dark Ghetto.” While these texts should be central to your discussion, also incorporate other relevant readings attached to form a well-rounded argument. It’s not necessary to limit your essay only to these set readings or to include every recommended text. Instead, strategically select and engage with one or two additional readings that best complement and enrich your main analysis.
The essay must directly address the question and include your critical reflections. Refer to the attached example for structure. Begin with a 200-word introduction outlining your argument and what will follow. Conclude with a 200-word summary of your propositions and your final stance. The main body should explore at least two perspectives related to the question, grounding your analysis in the readings before integrating and justifying your viewpoint.
No graphs are needed. Just a strong discussion in relation to the question. I am aiming for a first class grade (70%).
Here is what the markers of the essay are looking for:
70-79. Excellent work. Topic addressed clearly and with precision. The analysis of concepts, arguments and positions is rigorous and thorough. The argumentation is well-presented and cogent, with suitably novel features of presentation and structure. The student shows considerable mastery of the relevant literature and background readings.
60-69. Good work. Relevant literature consulted and understood. Essay or answer is well organised. Important concepts and positions presented clearly and analysed sufficiently. Arguments are cogent and properly supported by evidence and reasons. Some attempt at critical reflection.
50-59. Satisfactory work. Topic adequately formulated and understood, but not necessarily with great clarity or depth. Most relevant literature consulted and understood to a large degree. Important concepts and positions presented. Fails to meet the criteria for 60+ because of inadequate organisation, errors of understanding, lack of analysis and critical reflection, or failure to support arguments with reasons.